Chemical or Civil?
If I pick chemical, I would minor in sustainable energy and then pursue a graduate degree in nuclear engineering (or some other energy/industrial related field. Process? Pharmaceuticals?) If I choose civil, I would lean more towards the business side (minor in engineering business or get an MBA) and work as a sustainability consultant (specializing in urban planning? Or do restoration work on heritage sites, but that's less realistic). It wouldn't be hard to work as a consultant with a chemical degree, and I can focus on the facilities of a nuclear plant if I decide on civil.
Also not the end of the world if I don't choose the right one, first year courses are pretty much the same for all of engineering, so switching majors won't be toooooo hard.
Advantages of Chemical:
- More theoretical / closer to fundamental sciences.
- More job security
- Higher pay (industrial / energy sectors)
- Broader range of job opportunities / more specializations. (Though civil has a lot too)
- Courses sound more fun learning about concrete/steel.
- If I do choose to work in industrial / energy sector, won't likely to be located in a major city.
- Probably more competitive. This is solely based on the fact that the chemical presentation was located in a bigger room. As well, my chem mark is currently my lowest, I'll still get in, but omg it's gonna look bad "orz
Advantages of Civil:
- More prepared, I did think this is what I wanted to do for 4 years.
- Pretty buildings ;_;
- Get to face a wider range of problems.
- Can also have good job security/benefits if working for the government.
- If not working for the government, job opportunities tied to construction tends which is tied to the economy. Whereas energy is always needed.
- If working as consultant, will have to be good at dealing with people e_e
No comments:
Post a Comment